Vote Yes on this bill if you want Washington to create a board to design and, with federal approval and funding, launch a universal health plan that covers all medically necessary care for all residents.

Organizations that support this bill may include patient and consumer health advocates, labor unions, community clinics and public health groups, and some provider associations seeking broader coverage and simpler payment.

Vote No on this bill if you want to avoid creating a new health board and moving toward a state-run universal plan, preferring to keep the current system and prevent potential new taxes or mandates.

Organizations that oppose this bill may include private health insurers, some business and employer groups worried about costs, anti-tax organizations, and free-market policy groups skeptical of a state-run plan.

Vote Yes on this bill if you want higher taxes on cigarettes, vapes, and tobacco to reduce use and to fund emergency heart and stroke care, stronger enforcement against illegal sales, cancer research, and core public health services.

Organizations that support this bill may include public health advocates, hospitals and emergency medical groups, cancer research foundations, and anti-tobacco and youth prevention coalitions.

Vote No on this bill if you want to avoid higher prices on cigarettes, vapes, and tobacco, keep bigger tax discounts for products marketed as lower risk and the current vape tax system, and stop new earmarks of tobacco revenue.

Organizations that oppose this bill may include tobacco and vaping manufacturers, convenience and smoke shop associations, cigar industry groups, and anti-tax or small business coalitions.

Vote Yes on this bill if you want to ban police stops or arrests based on traits like race, language, religion, LGBTQ status, or politics, prevent home entries on federal administrative warrants, and require federal agents to follow these state limits when enforcing state law.

Organizations that support this bill may include civil rights groups, immigrant and refugee advocacy organizations, privacy and civil liberties nonprofits, and faith-based groups concerned about profiling.

Vote No on this bill if you want police and federal agents to retain broader authority to stop people based on contextual cues, use federal administrative warrants to enter homes, and prioritize immigration enforcement cooperation over added civil rights safeguards.

Organizations that oppose this bill may include some law enforcement associations, sheriff and police unions seeking broader discretion, and groups favoring closer cooperation with federal immigration enforcement.

Vote Yes on this bill if you want clear device insurance disclosures, easy cancellation with refunds, advance notice of changes, and convenient sales by trained store staff under state oversight and penalties for violations.

Organizations that support this bill may include wireless carrier and electronics retail associations, insurer trade groups, and state business chambers that favor clearer rules, streamlined point‑of‑sale insurance, and standardized disclosures.

Vote No on this bill if you want sales limited to fully licensed producers, tighter restrictions on add‑on insurance and vendor handling of premiums, and stronger consumer protections beyond refurbished‑part replacements and electronic notices.

Organizations that oppose this bill may include independent insurance agent associations, consumer protection groups concerned about add‑on fees and upselling, and privacy advocates wary of expanded electronic notices.

Vote Yes on this bill if you want stricter SNAP/TANF verification, more data‑matching (including lottery and gambling wins), faster removal of nonresidents using EBT out of state, and public reports on fraud and recoveries to cut improper payments.

Organizations that support this bill may include taxpayer watchdog groups, good‑government transparency advocates, and conservative public policy organizations focused on reducing benefit fraud.

Vote No on this bill if you want to avoid expanded surveillance and data sharing of aid recipients, reduce risks of wrongful removal or delays for eligible families, and prioritize access and support over enforcement.

Organizations that oppose this bill may include anti‑hunger and poverty advocacy groups, civil liberties organizations, disability rights groups, and legal aid providers concerned about wrongful denials.

Vote Yes on this bill if you want Arizona to prohibit puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, and gender transition surgeries for minors, bar public funding or coverage, penalize providers who offer or refer for this care, and allow private lawsuits and Attorney General enforcement starting after March 31, 2027.

Organizations that support this bill may include socially conservative advocacy groups, parental rights organizations, and some religious institutions that favor restricting gender transition treatments for minors.

Vote No on this bill if you want to preserve access for minors to gender-affirming medical care under clinical guidance, keep referrals and coverage options available, and avoid new penalties, funding bans, and litigation over such care.

Organizations that oppose this bill may include LGBTQ+ advocacy groups, major medical associations, pediatric and mental health organizations, and civil liberties groups.

Vote Yes on this bill if you want a voluntary, bilingual Blue Envelope program that helps drivers with autism and officers communicate during traffic stops, uses evidence-based design with community input, and protects participant privacy.

Organizations that support this bill may include autism advocacy groups, disability rights organizations, law enforcement agencies seeking better communication tools, and community health groups focused on safer interactions.

Vote No on this bill if you want to avoid dedicating resources to a new program, keep current practices without special materials, or address police-community communication through other methods.

Organizations that oppose this bill may include privacy and civil liberties groups concerned about labeling or unequal treatment, budget watchdogs wary of adding a new program, and groups that prefer broader training instead of special materials.

Vote Yes on this bill if you want Virginia to accelerate battery and long‑duration storage with clear model local rules, official safety standards, competitive bidding with independent audits, research partnerships, and targets aimed at a cleaner, more reliable grid.

Organizations that support this bill may include clean energy trade associations, environmental advocates, some electric utilities and energy storage companies, local government associations, and colleges that could partner on research and workforce programs.

Vote No on this bill if you want to avoid new storage mandates and possible bill surcharges, keep all siting and standards purely local without model ordinances, and delay large-scale long‑duration storage until further proof and lower costs.

Organizations that oppose this bill may include fossil fuel industry groups, some ratepayer watchdogs and business associations worried about higher costs, and local property rights groups concerned about siting rules and state-directed targets.

Vote Yes on this bill if you want federally funded colleges to regularly tell students about their rights, accommodations, and campus and community help for carrying a pregnancy to term, plus how to file a discrimination complaint.

Organizations that support this bill may include student-parent advocacy groups, pro-life and family policy organizations, and faith-based pregnancy resource networks.

Vote No on this bill if you want schools to decide their own messaging, prefer broader neutral information on all pregnancy options instead of a carry-to-term focus, and want to avoid new federal reporting duties.

Organizations that oppose this bill may include reproductive rights and abortion access groups, civil liberties and academic freedom advocates, and higher-education associations worried about new compliance costs.

Vote Yes on this bill if you want to reduce taxes on social housing properties, encourage creation and preservation of affordable rentals, and require long-term affordability commitments.

Organizations that support this bill may include affordable housing nonprofits, tenant advocacy groups, social housing agencies, and cities seeking to expand below-market rentals.

Vote No on this bill if you want to avoid expanding tax exemptions, protect local revenues for services like schools and public safety, or limit government-backed ownership in housing.

Organizations that oppose this bill may include taxpayer associations, real estate and landlord groups, and school or county budget advocates concerned about reduced property tax revenue.

Vote Yes on this bill if you want faster grid upgrades and new lines using existing corridors, modern grid technologies, coordinated permitting with tribal consultation, local community payments, and utility incentives that aim to deliver more reliable, affordable, and cleaner electricity.

Organizations that support this bill may include clean energy and climate groups, utilities and transmission developers, electrical workers and construction trades unions, data center and manufacturing associations seeking reliable power, and local governments interested in coordinated planning and community benefit fees.

Vote No on this bill if you want to avoid creating a new transmission authority with eminent domain for rights-of-way, keep stricter environmental review for rebuilds, limit state involvement in project development and financing, and prevent potential rate impacts from utility incentive returns.

Organizations that oppose this bill may include property rights and rural landowner groups concerned about eminent domain, environmental and wildlife advocates wary of streamlined reviews and habitat impacts, taxpayer and small-government organizations skeptical of a new authority, and ratepayer watchdogs worried about bill increases.

Vote Yes on this bill if you want the legislature to set session lengths by law, giving lawmakers flexibility to meet longer or shorter to handle budgets, emergencies, and complex problems.

Organizations that support this bill may include good-government reform groups, civic organizations focused on legislative effectiveness, and advocacy groups that want more time to address budgets and complex issues.

Vote No on this bill if you want to keep fixed constitutional limits on regular sessions to cap time in the state legislature, control costs, and maintain a predictable schedule.

Organizations that oppose this bill may include taxpayer watchdog groups, limited-government advocates, and business associations concerned about higher costs and less predictable lawmaking calendars.