
Digital Democracy Project members are the first in the nation to choose bills, discuss featured bills, and submit bills. We can't wait to hear your voice!
Vote Yes on this bill if you want Arizona to require election machines and software to keep accurate official time and to verify those time records during registration, ballot processing, vote counting, audits, and recounts.
Organizations that support this bill may include election integrity groups, good-government organizations, and public officials who want stricter timekeeping and record checks for election systems.
Vote No on this bill if you want to avoid new election mandates and misdemeanor penalties that could add burdens for local election workers without clearly changing election results.
Organizations that oppose this bill may include county governments, election administrator groups, and voting rights organizations concerned about extra costs, added paperwork, and criminal penalties for technical mistakes.
Vote Yes on this bill if you want voters to get more detailed cost, project, location, and tax information before school bond elections, and if you want separate ballot questions for items like stadiums, performing arts facilities, administrative buildings, and some technology purchases.
Organizations that support this bill may include taxpayer advocacy groups, government transparency organizations, and community groups that want clearer school bond elections and tighter limits on how bond money is spent.
Vote No on this bill if you want school districts to keep more flexibility in how they package bond proposals and adjust projects, and if you think the added ballot requirements could slow or complicate funding for school improvements.
Organizations that oppose this bill may include school districts, school board associations, school administrators, and arts or athletics advocates who believe the new ballot rules could make it harder to pass school facility bonds.
Vote Yes on this bill if you want all public and charter schools to give students yearly, age-appropriate lessons on how to avoid gun accidents, respond safely if they find a firearm, and encourage safer storage practices without promoting or condemning gun ownership.
Organizations that support this bill may include school safety groups, pediatric and public health organizations, parent groups, and firearm owners who favor safe storage and accident prevention education for children.
Vote No on this bill if you want to avoid adding a statewide firearm safety instruction requirement in schools, leave these decisions to parents and local districts, or prevent schools from taking on another mandated topic.
Organizations that oppose this bill may include gun rights groups, limited-government advocates, and local school organizations that object to new state curriculum mandates or worry about how firearm topics are taught in schools.
Vote Yes on this bill if you want every Michigan resident to have broad health coverage through one public system with no premiums, deductibles, or copays, plus added benefits like dental, vision, mental health, long-term care, and gender-affirming care.
Organizations that support this bill may include patient advocacy groups, labor unions, nurses and doctors who favor universal coverage, mental health advocates, disability rights groups, and LGBTQ health organizations.
Vote No on this bill if you want to keep private insurance as the main system, avoid possible new taxes or fees, limit state control over health care payments, and reduce the risk of major disruption during a switch to a single public plan.
Organizations that oppose this bill may include private health insurers, managed care companies, business groups worried about new taxes or fees, anti-tax organizations, and provider groups concerned about state-set payment rates.
Vote Yes on this bill if you want to discourage parents from using false information to enroll children in nonresident districts while allowing students already enrolled to finish the current school year without being forced out immediately.
Organizations that support this bill may include school districts, school administrators, and groups that want to prevent enrollment fraud while avoiding midyear disruptions for students.
Vote No on this bill if you want to avoid new enrollment penalties for families and preserve broader access to nonresident schools without limiting a student's future attendance after an address or residency dispute.
Organizations that oppose this bill may include school choice advocates, parent rights groups, and organizations concerned that families could face added barriers or penalties when trying to access better schools outside their home district.
Vote Yes on this bill if you want families to be able to apply to almost any public school in Michigan, with year-round applications, clearer seat postings, fewer residency barriers, and no tuition for nonresident students.
Organizations that support this bill may include school choice advocacy groups, parent organizations seeking more school options, charter school supporters, and groups that favor statewide open enrollment.
Vote No on this bill if you want local districts to keep more control over enrollment, protect neighborhood schools from losing students and funding, and avoid possible crowding, longer travel burdens, and added state oversight.
Organizations that oppose this bill may include local school boards associations, teachers unions, rural and small-district advocates, and groups worried that open enrollment could drain students and funding from neighborhood schools.
Vote Yes on this bill if you want a uniform schools‑of‑choice process that replaces district‑set tuition for nonresident students and expands affordable options for families.
Organizations that support this bill may include parent and school‑choice advocacy groups, education reform nonprofits, and business groups that favor open enrollment and lower barriers to attending schools across district lines.
Vote No on this bill if you want districts to keep control over whether to accept nonresidents and how much to charge them, limiting enrollment shifts and protecting local budgets.
Organizations that oppose this bill may include school boards, teachers unions, and rural or small districts concerned about losing students, funding, and local control over admissions and class sizes.
Vote Yes on this bill if you want to allow lawsuits for miscarriage, stillbirth, or embryo/fetus injury or death from wrongful or negligent acts, removing exemptions for the pregnant person, medical procedures, and lawful medications.
Organizations that support this bill may include pro-life and fetal-rights groups, some victims’ rights advocates, and faith-based organizations seeking civil accountability for harms to unborn children.
Vote No on this bill if you want to keep protections that shield pregnant individuals, health professionals, and lawful medication use from civil suits and avoid chilling reproductive and prenatal care.
Organizations that oppose this bill may include reproductive rights groups, medical and hospital associations, OB-GYN and pharmacy groups, and civil liberties organizations concerned about liability for lawful care.
Vote Yes on this bill if you want Michigan to drop the Algebra II mandate, expand math options, require personal finance and workplace readiness, allow coding to count as a world language, raise science to four credits starting with students entering high school in 2029–30, and provide model course plans to districts.
Organizations that support this bill may include business and employer associations, skilled-trades unions and apprenticeship programs, career and technical education coalitions, charter school groups, and financial literacy advocates.
Vote No on this bill if you want to keep Algebra II as a core requirement, avoid new future-skills and workplace classes or an added fourth science credit, and maintain the current graduation framework without these statewide changes.
Organizations that oppose this bill may include associations of math educators, some higher education and college admissions groups seeking uniform rigor, and traditional education advocates concerned about inconsistent standards.
Vote Yes on this bill if you want Michigan to end daylight saving time and stay on standard time all year with no more clock changes after the 2026 vote.
Public health and sleep organizations, parent‑teacher groups, some farm associations, and senior advocates may support this bill for stable year‑round standard time and fewer clock changes.
Vote No on this bill if you want Michigan to keep switching clocks twice a year and stay aligned with other states that observe daylight saving time.
State and local chambers of commerce, tourism and recreation groups, broadcasters, airlines, and multi‑state logistics companies may oppose this bill due to darker summer evenings and cross‑state scheduling conflicts.
Vote Yes on this bill if you want to shield compliant shooting ranges from noise lawsuits and criminal charges, limit state and local noise rules on them, and let existing ranges continue operating and expand events or membership.
Organizations that support this bill may include gun-rights groups, shooting range operators and associations, hunting and sportsmen clubs, and property-rights advocates who want certainty against noise lawsuits.
Vote No on this bill if you want residents and local governments to keep stronger tools to address gunfire noise, apply current noise limits to ranges, and restrict expansion when it disturbs nearby communities.
Organizations that oppose this bill may include neighborhood associations, local government groups, environmental and public health organizations, and noise-abatement advocates concerned about louder or expanded range activity.
Vote Yes on this bill if you want a single city or district to create a recreation authority, expanded authority to buy and manage parks and public forests, options for sustainable forestry and carbon credits, and voter‑approved millages and bonds to improve local recreation.
Local governments, parks and recreation departments, conservation and land‑trust groups, tourism and outdoor recreation advocates, and forestry or climate groups interested in carbon credits may support this bill.
Vote No on this bill if you want to limit local government growth and taxes, avoid commercial forestry and carbon credit programs on public land, keep current multi‑city formation rules, and prevent new bonding or millages for recreation projects.
Organizations that oppose this bill may include taxpayer associations, anti‑tax and small‑government groups, private property advocates concerned about land reversion, and environmental groups wary of commercial forestry on public lands.