Vote Yes on this bill if you want to break up large health care conglomerates, limit self-dealing, strengthen competition, and give patients, states, and federal regulators more power to challenge corporate practices that may raise costs or distort care.

Organizations that support this bill may include patient advocacy groups, independent physicians, independent pharmacies, antitrust reform groups, and consumer watchdog organizations that want to reduce health care consolidation and conflicts of interest.

Vote No on this bill if you want to preserve integrated health care companies, avoid forced sales and major business restructuring, and reduce the risk that new breakup rules could disrupt existing provider networks, drug distribution, or insurance operations.

Organizations that oppose this bill may include large health insurers, pharmacy benefit managers, drug and device wholesalers, hospital systems, and corporate health care trade groups that want to keep vertically integrated business models.

Vote Yes on this bill if you want the federal government to study which critical infrastructure goods could be made in the United States, how that could affect jobs and prices, and whether rural areas could benefit from new manufacturing opportunities.

Organizations that support this bill may include domestic manufacturing groups, labor unions, rural economic development organizations, and national security advocates that want to reduce reliance on foreign suppliers for critical infrastructure products.

Vote No on this bill if you want to avoid expanding federal study efforts, limit government involvement in shaping supply chains, and leave decisions about where to manufacture critical goods mainly to private businesses and the market.

Organizations that oppose this bill may include free-market or limited-government groups, fiscal watchdog organizations, and some import-dependent business associations that do not want more federal studies or possible pressure for reshoring production.

Vote Yes on this bill if you want the federal government to publicly track major taxpayer-funded projects that are badly delayed or far over budget and to explain who is responsible.

Organizations that support this bill may include taxpayer watchdog groups, good-government advocates, and transparency organizations that want more public reporting on costly federal projects.

Vote No on this bill if you want to avoid new federal reporting requirements and are concerned that public project listings could add administrative burdens without directly fixing delays or cost overruns.

Organizations that oppose this bill may include federal contractors, trade groups, or agency stakeholders who worry that added reporting rules could create more paperwork, public criticism, or disclosure of sensitive project details.

Vote Yes on this bill if you want to make corporate stock buybacks more expensive, limit tax breaks tied to stock issued to highly paid executives, and encourage companies to direct more money toward wages, hiring, and investment while raising federal revenue.

Organizations that support this bill may include labor unions, corporate accountability groups, tax fairness advocates, and public interest organizations that want companies to invest more in workers and long-term growth instead of stock buybacks.

Vote No on this bill if you want to preserve companies’ ability to use stock buybacks with lower tax costs, avoid higher taxes on corporations, and reduce the risk that firms cut investment, shift costs, or change compensation practices in response.

Organizations that oppose this bill may include business associations, corporate lobbying groups, stock market advocates, and investor organizations that believe companies should have broad flexibility to return money to shareholders.

Vote Yes on this bill if you want stricter inspections, reporting, and limits on compounders making copycat versions of approved drugs to improve safety and oversight.

Organizations that support this bill may include patient safety groups, consumer protection advocates, hospital systems, and brand-name drug manufacturers that favor tighter oversight of compounded drugs.

Vote No on this bill if you want to avoid heavier federal rules and fees that could raise prices, burden pharmacies, and limit access to some compounded medications.

Organizations that oppose this bill may include compounding pharmacy trade groups, some independent pharmacies, outsourcing facilities, and patient access advocates concerned about higher costs or reduced access to customized medicines.

Vote Yes on this bill if you want Congress to hold the Secretary of Defense accountable for alleged unlawful killings and careless handling of secret military information, even if that leads to removal from office.

Organizations that support this bill may include government accountability groups, anti-war organizations, civil rights advocates, and veterans or military ethics groups that want stronger oversight of military leaders.

Vote No on this bill if you want to keep the Secretary of Defense in place, reject impeachment based on these allegations, or avoid what you see as a politicized effort that could disrupt military leadership.

Organizations that oppose this bill may include conservative political groups, some defense hawks, executive power advocates, and organizations that see the accusations as unproven or politically motivated.

Vote Yes on this bill if you want the Crow Tribe to have clearer access to settlement funds, more control over reservation water and wastewater projects, extra time to meet key settlement deadlines, and a faster path to improving basic water service.

Organizations that support this bill may include the Crow Tribe, tribal sovereignty advocates, Native American organizations, and groups that support clean water and wastewater infrastructure in rural communities.

Vote No on this bill if you want tighter limits on how settlement funds are used, less flexibility for land purchases tied to water rights, fewer automatic cost increases, or stronger federal responsibility and oversight for long-term project outcomes.

Organizations that oppose this bill may include taxpayer watchdog groups or advocates of stricter federal spending limits who object to added funding flexibility, cost adjustments, or expanded tribal control over project assets.

Vote Yes on this bill if you want to end the separate advisory committee and rely on annual reports and regular reviews by current government officials to manage and preserve congressional records.

Organizations that support this bill may include government efficiency groups, congressional administrative offices, and records managers who prefer direct oversight by existing officials instead of a separate advisory committee.

Vote No on this bill if you want to keep an independent advisory committee in place to provide extra outside oversight and public accountability for the preservation of congressional records.

Organizations that oppose this bill may include transparency advocates, historians, archivists, and public records groups that want an independent advisory body to keep watch over how Congress preserves its records.

Vote Yes on this bill if you want the federal government to promote youth fitness and nutrition more strongly, revive a national fitness testing and awards system, and build partnerships that encourage healthier lifestyles.

Organizations that support this bill may include youth sports groups, physical education associations, public health nonprofits, nutrition advocates, and military readiness organizations.

Vote No on this bill if you want to avoid creating another presidential council, limit federal involvement in school fitness programs, and prevent spending on national fitness campaigns and related administration.

Organizations that oppose this bill may include groups concerned about expanding federal advisory bodies, adding pressure through fitness testing in schools, or increasing government spending on promotional programs.

Vote Yes on this bill if you want U.S. Customs to share more information with rights holders so they can identify counterfeit or infringing imports faster, protect consumers, and help legitimate businesses.

Organizations that support this bill may include brand owners, manufacturers, business groups, anti-counterfeiting coalitions, and consumer safety advocates that want stronger tools to stop fake and infringing imports.

Vote No on this bill if you want to limit the sharing of nonpublic trade and platform data, reduce risks to privacy and due process, and avoid giving private companies broader access to government-held import information.

Organizations that oppose this bill may include digital privacy groups, civil liberties advocates, online marketplace sellers, shipping and logistics companies, and trade groups concerned about broader government sharing of nonpublic business information.

Vote Yes on this bill if you want the federal government and phone industry to work together more aggressively to trace foreign scam calls, punish bad actors, and make it harder for risky providers to operate.

Organizations that support this bill may include consumer protection groups, anti-fraud advocates, law enforcement associations, and established phone companies that want stronger tools to track, expose, and block illegal foreign robocalls.

Vote No on this bill if you want to avoid giving regulators and private tracing groups more power to share and publish call-routing information, and if you worry the new bond and enforcement rules could burden legitimate providers or block lawful calls.

Organizations that oppose this bill may include small or newer telecom providers, telemarketing industry groups, and privacy or civil liberties advocates concerned about compliance costs, public blacklists, data-sharing immunity, and possible overblocking of legitimate calls.

Vote Yes on this bill if you want the federal government and food-sector partners to practice how to prevent, respond to, and recover from a terrorist attack on farms, livestock, or the food supply.

Organizations that support this bill may include farm groups, food producers, emergency management associations, and homeland security organizations that want better planning to protect the food supply from terrorism.

Vote No on this bill if you want to avoid creating a new federal preparedness exercise and believe existing programs are enough or that this threat does not justify more government planning.

Organizations that oppose this bill may include budget watchdogs, limited-government groups, or industry groups that view the exercise as extra federal bureaucracy with uncertain benefits.